Compare Toyota Camry 7 facelift vs Toyota Avalon 2 vs Toyota Avalon 4
Variants
2.0 AT
2.5 178hp AT
2.5 181hp AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5 250hp AT
3.5 268hp AT
2.5L Hybrid
3.5L
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
385 kg / 849 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Independent, spring
Tire Size
205/65 R15
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
155 mm / 6.1 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4874 mm / 191.9 in
4961 mm / 195.3 in
Size | Width
1821 mm / 71.7 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Weight
1590.0 kg / 3505.4 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2819 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.4 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.0 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
11.2 L/100km / 21.0 MPG (urban) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
215.0 km/h / 133.6 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
1MZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.8 cu-in / 2995.0 cc
Engine | Power
213.0 hp / 158.8 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
71.1 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
298 Nm / 219.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2014 ~ 2017
1999 ~ 2004
2012 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
16%
29%
Pros
- Very robust engine lineup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Superb long-term reliability
- Reliable drivetrain
- Clean and simple styling
- Proven reliability
- Exceptionally reliable powertrain
- Much improved styling
- Lots of space inside
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Controversial styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.