Compare Toyota Camry 6 facelift vs Toyota Camry 6 vs Toyota Avalon 3
Variants
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 169hp
2.5 179hp AT
3.5 AT
2.4 158hp
2.4 158hp AT
2.4 167hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
3.5 268hp AT
3.5 277hp AT
2004
2005
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 297.18 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 276.86 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Platform
Toyota K platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4806 mm / 189.2 in
5010 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1583.0 kg / 3489.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2820 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.291
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.6 L/100km / 31.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
ULEV
Engine
2GR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2011
2006 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
42%
24%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Improved I4 engine
- Newer 6-speed automatic transmissions for the I4s
- Robust engine options
- Proven to be exceptionally reliable
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Exceptionally reliable V6 engine
- Lots of space inside
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.