Compare Toyota Camry 5 vs Toyota Avalon 3 vs Toyota Camry 8
Variants
2.4 152hp
2.4 152hp AT
2.4 157hp
2.4 157hp AT
3.0 186hp AT
3.0 192hp AT
3.0 210hp AT
3.3 225hp AT
2004
2005
2.0
2.5 6AT
2.5 8AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 297.18 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 276.86 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Toyota K platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
137 mm / 5.4 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
127 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
5010 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Weight
1583.0 kg / 3489.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
98 ~ 101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.291
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.6 L/100km / 31.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
ULEV
Engine
2GR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
24%
44%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great long-term reliability
- Exceptionally reliable V6 engine
- Lots of space inside
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- High reliability
- Good comfort
- Decent handling
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bland styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.