Compare Toyota Avalon 3 vs Toyota Camry 7 facelift vs Toyota Camry 8
Variants
2004
2005
2.0 AT
2.5 178hp AT
2.5 181hp AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5 250hp AT
3.5 268hp AT
2.0
2.5 6AT
2.5 8AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 297.18 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 276.86 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Platform
Toyota K platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
127 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
5010 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Weight
1583.0 kg / 3489.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2820 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
98 ~ 101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.291
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.6 L/100km / 31.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
2GR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2014 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
43%
44%
Pros
- Exceptionally reliable V6 engine
- Lots of space inside
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Very robust engine lineup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Superb long-term reliability
- High reliability
- Good comfort
- Decent handling
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Controversial styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bland styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.