Compare Audi RS 6 C5 (4B) vs Audi RS 3 (8Y) vs Audi A3 (8V) facelift

Audi RS 6 C5 (4B)

Audi RS 3 (8Y)

Audi A3 (8V) facelift

Audi RS 6 C5 (4B)Audi RS 3 (8Y)Audi A3 (8V) facelift
Variants
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI S-tronic
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI S-tronic
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI S-tronic
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI S-tronic
2.0 TDI 150hp
2.0 TDI 150hp quattro
2.0 TDI 150hp S-tronic
2.0 TDI 184hp quattro S-tronic
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI quattro S-tronic
2.0 TFSI S-tronic
30 TDI
30 TDI S-tronic
30 TFSI
30 TFSI S-tronic
35 TDI S-tronic
35 TFSI
35 TFSI S-tronic

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%54%45%
Pros
  • Superb suspension setup
  • Powerful 4.2TT ahead of its time
  • Decent performance
  • Exclusive access to the inline-5 engine
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Not the best styling as a sporty sedans
  • Unreliable automatic transmission
  • No manual option
  • Rather nose-heavy
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather weird proportions
  • Questionable styling
  • Confusing new nomenclature
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.