Compare Audi A4 B6 vs Honda Civic 10 Sedan vs Honda Civic 9 Sedan
Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp CVT
1.8T 150hp quattro
1.8T 163hp
1.8T 163hp CVT
1.8T 163hp quattro
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp CVT
1.8T 170hp quattro
1.8T 170hp quattro AT
1.8T 190hp
1.8T 190hp quattro
1.9 TDI 101hp
1.9 TDI 115hp
1.9 TDI 130hp
1.9 TDI 130hp CVT
1.9 TDI 130hp quattro
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 FSI 150hp
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI 155hp
2.5 TDI 155hp CVT
2.5 TDI 163hp
2.5 TDI 163hp CVT
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro AT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
1.0 VTEC
1.0 VTEC CVT
1.5 CVT
1.5 VTEC Turbo
1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT
1.6 i-DTEC
1.6 i-DTEC AT
2.0
2.0 CVT
1.8 i-VTEC AT
1.8 i-VTEC
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
550 kg / 1213 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.6 m / 37.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1428 mm / 56.2 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4548 mm / 179.1 in
4545 mm / 178.9 in
Size | Width
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
142.0 hp / 105.9 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
79.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
174 Nm / 128.3 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
47%
24%
21%
Pros
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Getting really fuel-efficient
- Rather good looking
- Reliable engines and manual transmission
Cons
- CVT for FWD
- Unreliable automatic transmissions
- Still very front-heavy
- Some oil consumption issues
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Semi-independent rear suspensions on some models
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.