Compare Kia Optima 3 facelift vs Peugeot 407 vs Peugeot 508 facelift

Variants
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi AT
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
2.0 CVVT EcoDynamics
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.8 115
2.0 HDi 135
2.0 135
2.0 135 AT
2.2 HDi 170
2.2 160
2.2 160 AT
3.0 210
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
e-THP 165
e-THP 165 AT
VTi 120 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
HYbrid4
2.2 HDi 204 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
146 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1447 mm / 57.0 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4845 mm / 190.7 in
4830 mm / 190.2 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
159 ~ 160 g/km
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1850 kg / 4079 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4/V
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
44%
19%
19%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Reasonable exterior styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to repair
  • Rather good manual transmission
  • Slightly improved design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable design choice (though arguably better than 508)
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.