Compare Volkswagen Passat B6 vs Mazda 6 GG1 Sedan vs Mazda6 III facelift 2

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) Sedan (2002-2005)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2 Sedan (2018)

Volkswagen | Cars

Mazda | Cars

Variants

1.4 TSI

1.4 TSI Euro5

1.4 TSI Euro5 DSG

1.4 TSI DSG

1.4 TSI EcoFuel

1.4 TSI EcoFuel DSG

1.6 FSI

1.6 FSI AT

1.6

1.6 TDI

1.8 TSI

1.8 TSI DSG

1.8 TSI Tiptronic

1.9 TDI

2.0 BlueTDI

2.0 BlueTDI DSG

2.0 FSI

2.0 FSI 4Motion

2.0 FSI AT

2.0 TDI 110hp

2.0 TDI 110hp BlueMotion

2.0 TDI 140hp Euro5

2.0 TDI 140hp Euro5 4Motion

2.0 TDI 140hp Euro5 DSG

2.0 TDI 170hp Euro5

2.0 TDI 170hp Euro5 DSG

2.0 TDI 170hp

2.0 TDI DSG

2.0 TDI 140hp

2.0 TDI 140hp 4Motion

2.0 TDI 140hp DSG

2.0 TDI 140hp

2.0 TFSI

2.0 TFSI AT

2.0 TSI

2.0 TSI DSG

2.0 TSI AT

3.2 FSI 4Motion

R36

1.8

2.0

2.0 AT

2.0D 121hp

2.0D 136hp

2.3

2.0 145

2.0 165

2.0 165 AT

2.2D 150

2.2D 150 AT

2.2D 184

2.2D 184 AT

2.5 187

2.5 187 AT

2.5 194 AT

2.5 227 AT

2.5 250 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

500 L / 17.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

64.0 L / 16.9 gal

62.0 L / 16.4 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

14.4 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

10.8 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

12.6 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.4 m / 37.4 ft

10.8 m / 35.4 ft

11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

114 mm / 4.5 in

130 mm / 5.1 in

165 mm / 6.5 in

Size | Height

1472 mm / 58.0 in

1435 mm / 56.5 in

1450 mm / 57.1 in

Size | Length

4765 mm / 187.6 in

4680 mm / 184.3 in

Size | Width

1780 mm / 70.1 in

Track Width | Front

1552.0 mm / 61.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1551.0 mm / 61.1 in

Wheelbase

2709 mm / 106.7 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

2830 mm / 111.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.281

0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2002 ~ 2005

2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score

55%

30%

53%

Pros

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Good towing capacity

Sporty yet elegant design
Good towing capacity

Good exterior styling
Good engine reliability

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Questionable styling
Fewer reliable engine options

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup

Bland styling
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.