Compare Volkswagen Passat B5.5 vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift
Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp AT
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp AT
1.9 TDI 100hp
1.9 TDI 100hp AT
1.9 TDI 130hp 4Motion
1.9 TDI 130hp 5MT
1.9 TDI 130hp 6MT
1.9 TDI 130hp AT
2.0
2.3
2.3 4Motion
2.3 AT
2.5 TDI 4Motion
2.5 TDI 4Motion AT
2.8 4Motion
2.8 4Motion AT
4.0 4Motion
4.0 4Motion AT
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4871 mm / 191.8 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
31%
22%
Pros
- Very interesting W8 and VR5 engine options
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Decent drivetrain
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
Cons
- Poor performance
- Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.