HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift vs Volkswagen Jetta A6 vs Ford Mondeo 4

Variants
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
1.2 TSI 105hp
1.2 TSI 105hp BlueMotion
1.4 TSI 122hp
1.4 TSI 122hp DSG
1.4 TSI 160hp
1.4 TSI 160hp DSG
1.4 TSI Hybrid 170hp DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DSG
2.0 TSI 200hp
2.0 TSI 200hp DSG
2.0 TSI 210hp
2.0 TSI 210hp DSG
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
44%
37%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.