Compare Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 vs Ford Taurus 6 facelift
Variants
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT
2.0T
3.5
3.5 AWD
SHO
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
4534 mm / 178.5 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded) | 1963 mm / 77.3 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
19 in
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SelectShift
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
37%
23%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
- Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good power output
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Unreliable V6 engines (internal water pump)
- Basic suspension setup
- Generic exterior design
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.