Compare Ford Five Hundred vs Ford Mondeo 2 vs Ford Taurus 6
Variants
AWD
FWD
1.8 110hp
1.8 125hp
1.8 130hp
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 115hp
2.0D 115hp AT
2.0D 90hp
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 130hp AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
ST
AWD
FWD
SHO
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
595 L / 21.0 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
215/60 R17
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1530 mm / 60.2 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
5100 mm / 200.8 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1875 mm / 73.8 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1650.0 mm / 65.0 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
6J x 17
16 in
19 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 181.6 cu-in / 2976.0 cc
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
203.0 hp / 151.4 kW @ 5750 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.2 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
271 Nm / 199.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Aisin F21
Automatic 6F50
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2007
2009 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
16%
21%
Pros
- Lots of space inside
- Rather spacious
- Increased power output
- Better interior appointments
- More imposing exterior design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring drive
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Lack of refinement
- Limited by its basic suspension setup
- Uninspiring handling
- Unreliable engines (internal water pump)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.