Compare Ford Taurus 6 vs Ford Mondeo 2 vs Ford Five Hundred
Variants
AWD
FWD
SHO
1.8 110hp
1.8 125hp
1.8 130hp
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 115hp
2.0D 115hp AT
2.0D 90hp
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 130hp AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
ST
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
595 L / 21.0 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
255/45 R19
215/60 R17
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1542 mm / 60.7 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1530 mm / 60.2 in
Size | Length
5154 mm / 202.9 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
5100 mm / 200.8 in
Size | Width
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1875 mm / 73.8 in
Track Width | Front
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1650.0 mm / 65.0 in
Wheel Size
19 in
16 in
6J x 17
Wheelbase
2868 mm / 112.9 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
3.0 L / 181.6 cu-in / 2976.0 cc
Engine | Power
203.0 hp / 151.4 kW @ 5750 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.2 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Torque
271 Nm / 199.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 6F50
Automatic Aisin F21
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2012
2004 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
16%
12%
Pros
- Increased power output
- Better interior appointments
- More imposing exterior design
- Rather spacious
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- Limited by its basic suspension setup
- Uninspiring handling
- Unreliable engines (internal water pump)
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Lack of refinement
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring drive
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.