Compare BMW 5 Series G30 vs Chevrolet Malibu 9 vs Chevrolet SS Sedan

Variants
520d
520d ED AT
520d Mild Hybrid
520d Mild Hybrid xDrive
520d AT
520d xDrive AT
520i AT
525d AT
530d AT
530d xDrive AT
530e PHEV
530e PHEV xDrive
530e iPerformance
530i AT
530i xDrive AT
540d xDrive AT
540i AT
540i xDrive AT
M550d
M550i 462hp
M550i 530hp
1.5T
1.8 Hybrid EVT
2.0T
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
351.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Length
4923 mm / 193.8 in
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
92%
34%
60%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Up to 530hp of power and 760Nm of torque
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Good exterior design
  • Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
  • Reliable LS3 engine
  • Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
  • Generic exterior and interior design
  • Too many electronics
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring handling characteristics
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.