HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mazda 6 GJ facelift vs Mazda 3 BM Sedan vs Mazda 3 IV Sedan

Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.3 L / 6.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Torsion
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
4580 mm / 180.3 in
4660 mm / 183.5 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6d-Temp
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
35%
48%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.