Compare Mazda 6 GJ facelift vs Mazda 3 BL Sedan facelift vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2011 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
42%
29%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Lots of room inside
- Good value for money
- Easy to work on
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- GPF ruins many good petrol engines
- Stuck with MacPherson strut
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hatchback version fits the car better
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.