Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ)Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score28%42%35%
Pros
  • Very elegant exterior design
  • Reliability improved
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Suspension downgraded to MacPherson struts
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.