Compare Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift
Variants
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%35%27%
Pros
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.