Compare Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%27%48%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.