Compare Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ)Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%28%27%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Very elegant exterior design
  • Reliability improved
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No powerful engine options
  • Suspension downgraded to MacPherson struts
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.