Compare Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) vs Chevrolet Cruze

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)

Chevrolet Cruze

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)Chevrolet Cruze
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 136hp
2.3
1.6 113hp
1.6 113hp AT
1.6 124hp
1.7D
1.8 AT
1.8 AU/EU
1.8 NA
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%30%18%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Sporty yet elegant design
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good fuel economy
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.