Compare Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Renault Laguna III (X91)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Renault Laguna III (X91)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Renault Laguna III (X91)
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro5
1.5 dCi Euro5 AT
1.6
2.0
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5
2.0 Euro5
2.0 Turbo AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
GT 2.0 dCi 173
GT 2.0 dCi 173 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%35%19%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Small turning circle
  • Elegant styling
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.