Compare Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) vs Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela III (BM)Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%35%48%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.