Compare Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) vs Chevrolet Cruze

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL)

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)

Chevrolet Cruze

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL)Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)Chevrolet Cruze
Variants
1.6D 5MT
1.6D 6MT
1.6
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 185PS
2.5
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 136hp
2.3
1.6 113hp
1.6 113hp AT
1.6 124hp
1.7D
1.8 AT
1.8 AU/EU
1.8 NA
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score41%30%18%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Sporty yet elegant design
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good fuel economy
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Not as smart looking as the hatchback
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.