Compare Subaru Impreza GK vs Mazda 3 BL Sedan vs Mazda 6 GH2 Sedan
Variants
2.0
2.0 CVT
1.6D 5MT
1.6D 6MT
1.6
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 185PS
2.5
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16 89V
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4625 mm / 182.1 in
Size | Width
1778 mm / 70.0 in
Track Width | Front
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
FB20
L5-VE
Engine | Bore
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.7 cu-in / 1995.0 cc
Engine | Power
152.0 hp / 113.3 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
197 Nm / 145.3 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2016 ~
2010 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
41%
32%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Lost 6-speed manual
- Not as smart looking as the hatchback
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Downgraded diesel engines
- Exterior design becoming out of date
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.