Compare Chevrolet SS Sedan vs Chevrolet Impala 9 vs Chevrolet Malibu 8
Variants
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
3.5 211hp FlexFuel
3.5 212hp
3.6 300hp FlexFuel
3.9 230hp FlexFuel
3.9 245hp
5.3 303hp
5.3 SS 307hp
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 355x32 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut, with stabilizer
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link, with stabilizer
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1462 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4966 mm / 195.5 in
4865 mm / 191.5 in
Size | Width
1897 mm / 74.7 in
1851 mm / 72.9 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2916 mm / 114.8 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in
2738 mm / 107.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
60%
36%
41%
Pros
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
- Available with small block V8
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- The "rental car" look
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.