Compare Chevrolet Cruze facelift vs Ford Fusion vs Ford Taurus 6

Variants
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.7D
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.3
3.0
AWD
FWD
SHO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
469 L / 16.6 cu-ft
448 L / 15.8 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
538 kg / 1186 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/60 R16
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
4603 mm / 181.2 in
4831 mm / 190.2 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1797 mm / 70.7 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in
19 in
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 6F50

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016
2005 ~ 2009
2009 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
8%
21%
Pros
  • Decent exterior design
  • Handsome exterior design
  • Increased power output
  • Better interior appointments
  • More imposing exterior design
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Limited by its basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Unreliable engines (internal water pump)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.