Compare Chevrolet Cruze Sedan vs Dodge Charger 6 vs Chevrolet SS Sedan
Variants
1.6 113hp
1.6 113hp AT
1.6 124hp
1.7D
1.8 AT
1.8 AU/EU
1.8 NA
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT
R/T 5.7 345PS
R/T 5.7 345PS AWD
R/T 5.7 355PS
R/T 5.7 375PS
R/T 5.7 375PS AWD
SE 2.7 181PS
SE 2.7 192PS
STR-8
SXT 3.5
SXT 3.5 AWD
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1479 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
5082 mm / 200.1 in
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1891 mm / 74.4 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
3048 mm / 120.0 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
68%
60%
Pros
- Good fuel economy
- Cheap to purchase
- Wonderful SRT-8
- Return of the HEMI V8
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
- Uninspiring handling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat outdated automatic transmissions
- Questionable design choices
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.