Compare Chevrolet Impala 9 vs Chrysler 300 LD vs Chevrolet SS Sedan
Variants
3.5 211hp FlexFuel
3.5 212hp
3.6 300hp FlexFuel
3.9 230hp FlexFuel
3.9 245hp
5.3 303hp
5.3 SS 307hp
3.6 286hp
3.6 292hp
3.6 AWD
5.7
5.7 AWD
SRT-8
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
531 kg / 1171 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut, with stabilizer
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link, with stabilizer
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1851 mm / 72.9 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2807 mm / 110.5 in
3052 mm / 120.2 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
227 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
0.334
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
240.0 km/h / 149.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
Chrysler 392 HEMI V8
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
82%
60%
Pros
- Available with small block V8
- Amazing Hemi engines (and OK V6s)
- One of the best styling from Chrysler
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- The "rental car" look
- Bad diesel engine
- 8-speed is not universally used
- AWD nonsense
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.