Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Impala 10 vs Chevrolet Malibu 8
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4 Ecotec eAssist
2.5 Ecotec
3.6
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
235/50 R18, 245/45 R19, 245/40 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.5 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1496 mm / 58.9 in
1462 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
5113 mm / 201.3 in
4865 mm / 191.5 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in
2738 mm / 107.8 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Redline
7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
42%
41%
Pros
- Lots of space
- Improved exterior styling
- Decent comfort
- Easy to work on
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Poor handling
- Mediocre build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.