Compare Volvo S90 vs Volvo S60 II facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift
Variants
D3 Euro6
D3 Euro6d
D3 Euro6 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6 AT
D4 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T4 Euro6 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2018
T5 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2017
T5 254PS AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 Euro6 AWD
T6 Euro6 AWD AT
T8 AWD Hybrid
T8 AWD PHEV
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
61%
22%
Pros
- Elegant exterior design
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.