Compare Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless vs Canon EOS M100 Mirrorless vs Canon EOS 4000D DSLR

Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless

Canon EOS M100 Mirrorless

Canon EOS 4000D DSLR

Canon EOS M50 Mark II MirrorlessCanon EOS M100 MirrorlessCanon EOS 4000D DSLR

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%48%46%
Pros
  • Fully articulated LCD
  • Good 10.0 fps burst rate
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Very light
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Very light
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Rather compact
  • Quite light
Cons
  • Poor battery life
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Low resolution EVF
  • Canon is all but abandoning the EF-M mount
  • Poor battery life
  • Low 6.1 fps burst rate
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Menu not touch-enabled
  • Very low 3.0 fps burst rate
  • Low 18 MP resolution
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Viewfinder coverage is cropped at 95%
  • Viewfinder with low 0.8x magnification
  • Cheap look and feel

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.