Compare Mercedes EQE V295 vs Mercedes-Benz S-Class W223 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class W212 facelift

Mercedes EQE V295

Mercedes-Benz S-Class W223

Mercedes-Benz E-class W212 facelift

Mercedes EQE V295Mercedes-Benz S-Class W223Mercedes-Benz E-class W212 facelift
Variants
EQE 350 90 kWh (292 Hp)
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
E 200
E 200 CDI
E 200 CDI MT
E 200 MT
E 220 BlueTEC
E 220 BlueTEC 4MATIC
E 220 CDI
E 220 CDI MT
E 250
E 250 CDI
E 250 CDI 4MATIC
E 250 CDI MT
E 300
E 300 4MATIC
E 300 BlueTEC
E 300 BlueTEC HYBRID
E 350
E 350 4MATIC
E 350 BlueTEC
E 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
E 400
E 400 4MATIC
E 500
E 500 4MATIC
E 63 AMG
E 63 AMG 4MATIC
E 63 S AMG 4MATIC

Reviews

Neofiliac score70%84%73%
Pros
  • Good comfort
  • Decent performance
  • Good performance
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Torquey yet robust M157 in the E63 AMG
  • Arguably improved build quality
  • Better exterior styling than the pre-facelift
Cons
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Compensation with electronic gimmicks
  • Ugly design
  • 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
  • No more V12
  • AMG went 4MATIC
  • MacPherson front suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.