HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare BMW X3 G01 LCI vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Citroen C5 Aircross

Variants
20d
20i
30d
30e
30i
M40d
M40i
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.0 deg
22.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
225/60 R18 104W XL
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
Compact Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
204 mm / 8.0 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
230 mm / 9.1 in
Size | Height
1676 mm / 66.0 in
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2864 mm / 112.8 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Electric Range
42.0 km / 26.1 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine
B48B20
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Availability
2021
2020
Debut
2021-06-09

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
35%
15%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Tiny engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.