Compare BMW X3 G01 LCI vs Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Nissan Juke
Variants
20d
20i
30d
30e
30i
M40d
M40i
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.0 deg
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/60 R18 104W XL
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Body Style
Compact Crossover
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
5-door Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
204 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1676 mm / 66.0 in
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2864 mm / 112.8 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Electric Range
42.0 km / 26.1 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine
B48B20
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Availability
2021
2021
Debut
2021-06-09
2021-02-18
Made In
UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
57%
3%
6%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Cheap to buy
- So ugly it's endearing
Cons
- Tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
- Very ugly
- Horrible build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Only available with tiny engines
- Waste of raw materials
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible Renault engines
- Bad CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.