Compare Kia Sportage 5 vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes GLK-Class X204

Variants
1.6 CRDi 116 MT
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 MT
1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD
2.0 CRDi AT
2.0 CRDi AWD AT
2.0 MPI AT
2.0 MPI MT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 GDI AWD AT
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
GLK 200
GLK 200 CDI
GLK 200 CDI AT
GLK 220 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 220 CDI
GLK 220 CDI AT
GLK 250 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 250 4MATIC AT
GLK 280 4MATIC AT
GLK 320 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI Euro5 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 4MATIC AT

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
23.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
19.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
35.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Water Fording
300 mm / 11.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Lithium-ion
Body Style
Compact crossover
5-door SUV
Platform
Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
123 mm / 4.8 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2755 mm / 108.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
G4KIII
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Debut
2021-06-08
Made In
South Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
60%
45%
Pros
  • Decent interior
  • High cargo capacity
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lethargic drivetrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.