Compare Mercedes C-Class W206 vs Mercedes C-class W203 facelift vs Ford Falcon
Variants
C 180
C 200
C 200 4MATIC
C 200d
C 220d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 300
C 300 4MATIC
C 300d
C 300e
C 30 CDI AMG
C 55 AMG
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI DPF
C 200 CDI DPF MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI DPF
C 220 CDI DPF MT
C 230 MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor MT US
C 230 Kompressor US
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 280 MT
C 280 4MATIC
C 280
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
C 320 CDI MT
C 320 CDI
C 350 MT
C 350 4MATIC
C 350
2.0T AT
4.0
4.0 AT
4.0T
4.0T AT
XR8
XR8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
535 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
4949 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1868 mm / 73.5 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2838 mm / 111.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
39.0 m / 127.9 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
0.291
Electric Range
99.0 km / 61.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
15.5:1
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic, 9G-TRONIC
Production
Availability
2021
2014 ~ 2016
Debut
2021-02-23
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
76%
78%
Pros
- Excellent ride quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- S-Class-inspired infotainment system
- Lots of standard equipment
- Reintroduction of C55 AMG
- Slightly less rusty
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Great range of V8 (supercharged!) and I6 lineup (forget the Ecoboost)
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Manual transmission + SC V8
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
- Non-AMG models still looked "off"
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.