Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV facelift vs Citroen AMI vs Citroen C3 III facelift
Variants
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft ~ 1614 L / 57.0 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
2
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring, Torsion
MacPherson strut
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
7.2 m / 23.6 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
5.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1611 mm / 63.4 in
1520 mm / 59.8 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4145 mm / 163.2 in
2410 mm / 94.9 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1390 mm / 54.7 in
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
1628.0 kg / 3589.1 lbs
485.0 kg / 1069.2 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
14 in
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
Performance
Charging Time
120V: 4 miles of range in approx. 1 hour, 240V: Full charge in approx. 7 hours, DC Fast Charge: Up to 100 miles in 30 min
Electric Range
259 miles (416 km)
Top Speed
45.0 km/h / 28.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
8 hp / 6.0 kW
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2020
2020
Debut
2021-02-14
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
17%
8%
Pros
- Tax incentives
- Very small turning circle
- Cute styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible styling
- Poor build quality
- EV nonsense
- Battery pollution
- Poor handling
- Poor suspension setup
- More like a toy
- Slower than a golf cart
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.