Compare Audi e-tron GT vs Audi A4 B5 facelift vs Alfa Romeo 166
Variants
e-tron GT quattro
RS e-tron GT
1.6
1.8
1.8 AT
1.8 quattro
1.8 Turbo AT
1.8T
1.8T
1.8T quattro
1.8T quattro
1.8T quattro AT
1.9 TDI 110hp
1.9 TDI 110hp quattro
1.9 TDI 116hp
1.9 TDI 116hp AT
1.9 TDI 116hp quattro
1.9 TDI 90hp
1.9 TDI 90hp AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 quattro
2.4 quattro AT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.5 TDI quattro
2.5 TDI quattro AT
2.8
2.8 AT
2.8 quattro
2.8 quattro AT
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
93.4 kWh (gross) | 83.7 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
4-door battery-electric Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
4989 mm / 196.4 in
4479 mm / 176.3 in
4720 mm / 185.8 in
Size | Width
1964 mm / 77.3 in | 2158 mm / 85.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1733 mm / 68.2 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
Transmission | Gears
2-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
1999 ~ 2000
Debut
2021-02-09
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
75%
42%
28%
Pros
- Good performance
- Up to 452km electric range
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Rather good exterior styling
- Multi-link + Double-wishbone for AWD models
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
Cons
- EV nonsense
- Loaded with electronic BS
- Lesser rear suspension setup for FWD
- Uninspiring styling
- Unreliable automatic transmission
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.