Compare Hyundai Tucson 4 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Opel Grandland facelift
Variants
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 PHEV AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 150
1.6 T-GDI 150 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV DCT
1.6 T-GDI 180
1.6 T-GDI 180 MHEV AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 230 Hybrid AT
1.6 T-GDI Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 Turbo
1.2 Turbo AT
1.5d AT
1.6 Turbo PHEV
1.6 Turbo PHEV AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.7 deg
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
Compact crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
925 mm
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1609 mm / 63.3 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4477 mm / 176.3 in
Size | Width
1906 mm / 75.0 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2020-09-15
Made In
Korea, China, Brazil, India, Russia...
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
27%
17%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Some towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Rather ugly
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.