Compare Hyundai Tucson 4 vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes GLB X247
Variants
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 PHEV AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 150
1.6 T-GDI 150 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV DCT
1.6 T-GDI 180
1.6 T-GDI 180 MHEV AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 230 Hybrid AT
1.6 T-GDI Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
AMG GLB 35 4MATIC
GLB 180d
GLB 200
GLB 200d
GLB 200d 4MATIC
GLB 220d
GLB 220d 4MATIC
GLB 250
GLB 250 4MATIC
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
19.9 deg
18.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
13.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.7 deg
16.5 deg
18.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
Compact crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
925 mm
123 mm / 4.8 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
Size | Length
4634 mm / 182.4 in
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2829 mm / 111.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2019
Debut
2020-09-15
2019-06
Made In
Korea, China, Brazil, India, Russia...
Mexico, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
60%
36%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Some towing capacity
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Reliable engine lineup
- Decent styling
- Marginal offroad capabilities
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Rather ugly
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.