Compare Ford Bronco 6 4-door vs Chrysler Aspen vs Toyota Sequoia

Variants
2.3 EcoBoost
2.3 EcoBoost MT
2.7 EcoBoost
Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost
4.7 4WD
4.7
4.7 FlexFuel 4WD
4.7 FlexFuel
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 376 4WD
5.7 376
5.7 Hybrid 4WD
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
4.7 VVT-i AWD

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
12.4 L / 13.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.6 L / 7.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
102.0 L / 26.9 gal
99.0 L / 26.2 gal
Passengers
5
8
5
Payload
507 kg / 1118 lbs
650 kg / 1433 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 350x34 mm
Ventilated discs, 336x28 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 336x20 mm
Disc, 352x22 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Size | Length
5180 mm / 203.9 in
Size | Width
1980 mm / 78.0 in
Track Width | Front
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
1675.0 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1680.0 mm / 66.1 in
Weight
2600.0 kg / 5732.0 lbs
2300.0 kg / 5070.6 lbs
Wheelbase
3027 mm / 119.2 in
3000 mm / 118.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
12.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
12.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.391
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
85.4 mm / 3.4 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 180.0 cu-in / 2950.0 cc
4.7 L / 284.6 cu-in / 4664.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
52.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
427 Nm / 314.9 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Debut
2020-07-13
Made In
USA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
87%
65%
76%
Pros
  • Modern classic styling
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Manual transmission
  • Removable doors
  • Convertible form factor
  • Robust frame
  • High cargo capacity
  • Powerful engines
  • Solid on-road performance
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
Cons
  • Some engine problems with the V6
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • High 0.39 drag coefficient
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Worse offroad capabilities than the Land Cruiser
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.