Compare Volkswagen ID.3 vs Renault Twingo III facelift vs Renault Megane IV

Variants
Pro
Pro Performance
Pro S
Pure Performance
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.2 TCe 100
1.2 TCe 130
1.2 TCe 130 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 SCe 115
1.7 dCi 150 7AT
1.7 dCi 150 6AT
GT 1.6 dCi 165 AT
GT 1.6 TCe 205 AT
RS 1.8
RS 1.8 AT
RS Trophy 1.8

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1267 L / 44.7 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
408.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Platform
MEB

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1568 mm / 61.7 in
1447 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4261 mm / 167.8 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2770 mm / 109.1 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2669 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020-06-17 (2020-10 delivery date)
Debut
2019 IAA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
3%
22%
Pros
  • Up to extraordinary 549km electric range
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Very small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.