Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback facelift vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.6
2.0
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1310 L / 46.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4475 mm / 176.2 in
4460 mm / 175.6 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2020
2016 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
37%
32%
Pros
- Decent build quality
- Decent performance
- Good handling
- Overall good styling
- Characterful flat-4 engine
- Good front-end styling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- CVT
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Bad CVT
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.