Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Nissan Leaf vs Hyundai IONIQ facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
24 kWh
24 kWh 2012+
30 kWh
Electric
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Transverse stabilizer, Torsion
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4445 mm / 175.0 in
4470 mm / 176.0 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1967 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2045 mm / 80.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
CO2 Emission
26 g/km
Electric Range
311.0 km / 193.2 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ZEV
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
72.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 96.4 cu-in / 1580.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
66.5 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
147 Nm / 108.4 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
2%
20%
Pros
- Decent build quality
- Decent performance
- Good handling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Disastrous battery degradation
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Barely acceptable electric range
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.