HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Hyundai i20 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
35%
23%
Pros
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.