Compare Hyundai i20 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.6 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
23%
46%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Sweet design
Cons
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- More emission control systems to fail
- More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.