Compare Hyundai i20 vs DS 3 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift 2

Variants
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
PureTech 110
PureTech 110 AT
PureTech 130
VTi 82
VTi 82 AT
BlueHDi 120
BlueHDi 99
THP 165
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.6 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
3954 mm / 155.7 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1715 mm / 67.5 in | 2004 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
1469.0 mm / 57.8 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
18%
23%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.