Compare Hyundai Sonata 8 vs Hyundai i40 Sedan vs Hyundai Elantra 6 AD

Variants
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
1.6 GDI
1.7 CRDi 116hp
1.7 CRDi 136hp
1.7 CRDi 136hp AT
2.0 GDI
2.0 GDI AT
1.4 DCT
2.0 MT
2.0 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
525 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1672 L / 59.0 cu-ft
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Vented 12"
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
solid 11.2"
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Independent, spring
Torsion bar
Tire Size
205/60 R16, 215/50 R17, 225/45 R18
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
36.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4900 mm / 192.9 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4569 mm / 179.9 in
Size | Width
1859 mm / 73.2 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
1597.0 mm / 62.9 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8.0J x 18
15 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2770 mm / 109.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Displacement
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
6- or 8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2011 ~ 2015
2016 ~ 2019
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
21%
16%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Acceptable styling from some angles
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Improved drivetrain range
  • Better styling
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Budget suspension setup
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.