Compare Mercedes-Benz E-Class W213 facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) vs Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mercedes-Benz E-Class W213 facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mercedes-Benz E-Class W213 faceliftMazda 3 / Axela III (BM)Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)
Variants
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 300
E 300d 4MATIC
E 300de
E 300de 4MATIC
E 300e
E 300e 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score87%35%48%
Pros
  • Good performance available
  • Still offered with V8
  • Rather solid drivetrain
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Too many electronics
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.